J Epilepsy Res 2023;13(1):1-6
In published article by Hazany S et al., there is an error in the data value and location of the ‘Absolute level’ column in
Table 1. Modify the data values and locations as follows.
Before correction:
Patient |
Clinical data |
MRS data |
|
|
Age (years) |
Seizures (months) |
Average seizure duration (minutes) |
Diet duration (months) |
Serum βHB (mM/L) |
GSH (parietal white matter) |
NAA/tCr |
βHB absolute level (IU) |
|
Absolute level (IU) |
GSH/tCr |
1 |
Pre-KD |
42 |
3–5 |
1–5 |
4 |
0.15 |
|
0.02 |
GM: 1.46 |
GM: 0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM: 0.12 (SD: 268) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 0.65 (SD: 56) |
0.07 |
WM: 1.30 |
WM: 0.00 |
Post-KD |
|
1–2 |
0.5 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.33 |
GM: 1.57 |
GM: 0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM: 1.40 (SD: 35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 1.50 (SD: 31) |
0.19 |
WM: 1.28 |
WM: 0.02 |
2 |
Pre-KD |
35 |
2–4 |
2–5 |
7 |
0.10 |
|
0.02 |
GM: 1.39 |
GM: 0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM: 0.10 (SD: 370) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 0.80 (SD: 39) |
0.12 |
WM: 1.42 |
WM: 0.25 |
Post-KD |
|
1–2 |
0.5 |
|
0.10–0.18 |
|
0.15 |
GM: 1.46 |
GM: 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM: 0.70 (SD: 51) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 2.00 (SD: 16) |
0.35 |
WM: 1.40 |
WM: 0.56 |
After correction:
Patient |
Clinical data |
MRS data |
|
|
Age (years) |
Seizures (months) |
Average seizure duration (minutes) |
Diet duration (months) |
Serum βHB (mM/L) |
GSH (parietal white matter) |
NAA/tCr |
βHB absolute level (IU) |
|
Absolute level (IU) |
GSH/tCr |
1 |
Pre-KD |
42 |
3–5 |
1–5 |
4 |
0.15 |
GM: 0.12 (SD: 268) |
0.02 |
GM: 1.46 |
GM: 0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 0.65 (SD: 56) |
0.07 |
WM: 1.30 |
WM: 0.00 |
Post-KD |
|
1–2 |
0.5 |
|
0.12 |
GM: 1.40 (SD: 35) |
0.33 |
GM: 1.57 |
GM: 0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 1.50 (SD: 31) |
0.19 |
WM: 1.28 |
WM: 0.02 |
2 |
Pre-KD |
35 |
2–4 |
2–5 |
7 |
0.10 |
GM: 0.10 (SD: 370) |
0.02 |
GM: 1.39 |
GM: 0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 0.80 (SD: 39) |
0.12 |
WM: 1.42 |
WM: 0.25 |
Post-KD |
|
1–2 |
0.5 |
|
0.10–0.18 |
GM: 0.70 (SD: 51) |
0.15 |
GM: 1.46 |
GM: 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WM: 2.00 (SD: 16) |
0.35 |
WM: 1.40 |
WM: 0.56 |
Additionally, the CI abbreviation in Figure 2 of the above article is modified from ‘confidence interval’ to ‘complex I’.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.