Introduction
Reflex epilepsy is a type of epilepsy in which seizures are provoked habitually by external stimulus or uncommonly by internal mental process.1 Eating epilepsy (EE) is a distinct subtype of reflex epilepsy, where seizures are triggered by the act of eating. The first case of EE was described as early as 1967 in which seizures were triggered during meals and even at the mear sight of meal.2 This variant though scantly reported in other parts of world, has been widely reported from Indian subcontinent in last 2–3 decades.3,4 Seizures usually happen during or few minutes after meals.5 Eating is a complex process which starts from thought of food to satisfactory feeling of satiety after eating. It involves many stimuli which may have different pathophysiology in seizure occurrence in patients with EE.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional neuroimaging evidence suggest involvement of complex perisylvian neuronal circuits.6 Many of these patients are not well controlled of seizures despite polytherapy. We describe case reports here to present various characteristics of EE in our patient series from North India.
Case Report
A total of 12 patients out of 1,532 patients presenting to epilepsy clinic were detected to have EE in 18 months (January 2015 to June 2016). Age and duration of seizure onset, seizure semiology and on-going medications, their EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings were tabulated as variables (Table 1). A follow up after 6 months was done during their scheduled visit or telephonically for assessing treatment response (Table 2). Categorical variables were summarized using counts and percentages. Quantitative variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR).
Of them, 11 patients (91.7%) were male. Median age at presentation was 24 years (21.5, 27.5) and median age at onset of seizures was 13.5 years (10.5, 23.0). None of them had a family history of seizure disorder. Nine patients (75%) reported ‘eating’ as the only triggering stimuli. Others (three patients, 25%) had an additional trigger such as anxiety, while bathing or spontaneously. Majority of the patients (seven patients, 58.3%) developed seizures either during lunch or dinner. Rest of them (five patients, 41.7%) had no such predilection to any meal. Semiology of seizures was variable and complex in most of them. Four patients (33.3%) had aura preceding the events. Most of them (11 patients, 91.7%) had focal onset seizures. Focal onset impaired awareness seizures were noted in nine of them while focal to bilateral tonic clonic type was present in seven of them. Only one patient (8.3%) had generalized onset tonic seizures (Table 1).
All patients underwent routine EEG recording during meals. Five of them (41.7%) had temporal or centrotemporal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in form of spikes while one of them (8.3%) had bilateral posterior head region IEDs. Six patients (50%) had normal EEG during eating. Neuroimaging (MRI brain) was abnormal in five patients (41.6%). Two had bilateral lesions and three had unilateral lesions. Three patients had perisylvian gliosis, one had right frontal lesion and one had right temporal lesion. Eight patients (75%) had MRI and/or EEG abnormality confined to perisylvian region (Table 1).
Eleven out of 12 patients were on adequate doses of antiepileptic drugs at presentation. They were started on clobazam, a benzodiazepine antiepileptic in doses of 5 to 10 mg half hour prior to meals. Addition of clobazam, led to reduction in seizure frequency in nine out of 11 patients (81.8 %). Of these nine patients, four became seizure free for many months together. One did not show any response while one had increase in seizure frequency after addition of clobazam. One patient (patient No. 9) improved by optimizing his ongoing antiepileptic drug therapy without addition of clobazam (Table 2).
Discussion
Eating epilepsy is a rare subtype of reflex epilepsy. Because of unknown reasons it has been widely reported from Indian subcontinent3–8 and only scarcely reported as small case series9,10 or case reports11–13 from other parts of the world. A maximum prevalence of eating epilepsy is 5.6% of all epilepsy cases, which has been reported from Srilanka.5 In our north Indian study, it is noted to be less than 1% (0.78%, 12 in 1,532). The world over prevalence of eating epilepsy is considered to be 0.05 to 0.1% of all epilepsies.11 EE has male predominance3,7–10 and the usual age of onset of symptoms is 2nd decade.3–6 In our case series, we also observed similar clinical characteristics.
Various authors have noted significant heterogeneity in triggers for these seizures. Act of mastication while eating,2 oesophageal stimulation,14 satisfactory feeling of having meal,15 timing of the meal,10,16 sight, smell or even thought of food17 have been described in different groups of patients worldwide. Heavy carbohydrate rich meals traditionally consumed in Indian subcontinent particularly during lunch and dinner could be one of the factors contributing to its high prevalence in predisposed individuals.3,8
Since these seizures occur in relation to food, EE is almost exclusively a symptomatic focal epilepsy.11 Multiple case reports and case series have reported focal aetiologies like cortical malformation,13,18 hypoxic brain damage,12 meningoencephalitis19 or space occupying lesions6,9,20 involving temporal lobe8,12,16,20 and perisylvian area.6,9,19 Sometimes they may not have any structural lesions on neuroimaging4,9 In our series majority of the patients had either MRI or EEG abnormality localizing to perisylvian region. Apart from these acquired causes, cases of defined genetic etiology in pediatric population with mutations in SYNGAP1 gene21 and duplication of MECP2 gene22 have been described. Cluster of familial cases with EE have also been reported by Senanayake23 and Yacubian et al.24
The predominant semiology was sudden unresponsiveness, staring look with or without subtle tonic posturing of limbs. Eyelid myoclonia with short absences with tonic, atonic or myoclonic movements of limbs or trunk has been described in intellectually disabled children with SYNGAP1 mutation, especially around meals.21 One third of our patients described nonspecific aura prior to seizures. The aura was described as light or heavy headedness, uneasiness, or epigastric sensation suggesting a temporal lobe onset. The seizures characteristically are focal onset with impaired awareness.7 These focal seizures may generalize to tonic, atonic or myoclonic seizures infrequently.25 Our 11 out of 12 patients had focal onset seizures.
IEDs have diagnostic as well as localization significance in these patients. Most studies have found focal IEDs at temporal and centro-temporal areas of brain3,10,16 in up to 70% of patients.3 Continuous EEG recording during meals increases the frequency of these discharges and could also precipitate ictus. Ictal discharges consist of focal slowing or fast beta activity during these episodes.6 Ictal and interictal EEG in most of these patients showed fronto-central or temporal discharges3,6,9–11,12 even in MRI negative patients. Our six patients had a similar distribution of IEDs. Children with SYNGAP1 mutation have shown short duration 3/sec irregular high amplitude spike and wave discharges in temporal and occipital areas.21
Positive neuroimaging findings such as gliosis, encephalomalacia or space occupying lesions have been noted either at temporal lobe9,12,16,20 or perisylvian areas6,18,19 in some of the patients irrespective of the side involved. Our neuroimaging positive patients also had gliosis either at perisylvian area or inferior frontal and temporal lobes. These locations represent opercular area which innervates facial, pharyngeal, masticatory, tongue, laryngeal and branchial muscles. Ictal SPECTand EEG may be of help in localization and determining the extent of lesion5,19 specially in MRI negative patients.
The studies suggest eating to be a complex process which leads to activation of opercular cortex and generation of multiple efferent sensory. Investigators have suggested two different type of syndromes. The one with involvement of temporo-limbic region has reflex eating seizures from onset of epilepsy. Triggers usually constitute gustatory, olfactory, autonomic and emotional stimuli. Seizures in this syndrome may occur during any time of meal. The other syndrome involving extralimbic/suprasylvian region (extratemporal) which precipitates reflex eating seizures in previously existing epileptic disorder. Seizures usually precipitate during first few minutes of a meal because of proprioceptive sensory stimuli from complex lingual, buccal and pharyngeal movements.10 These sensory stimuli lead to recruitment of epileptogenic neurons triggering a critical mass of cortex to precipitate seizures.26 Recently it has been suggested that hyperexcitability of perisylvian/opercular region (including insular cortex) leads to EE irrespective of the side of lesion.6,25 Three fourth of patients in our study had perisylvian electrographic or neuroimaging localization.
Available literature suggests variable treatment response ranging from good control3,9 to treatment refractory EE.10 Clobazam was found to be useful in less than 10% of a large Srilankan study.3 We used clobazam in 11 patients. Patients were asked to consume 5 mg or 10 mg of clobazam half hour prior to meal in addition of their pre-existing antiepileptic drugs in adequate doses. On 6 months follow up, nine of 11 patients had responded with decrease in number of seizures. Four of these showed excellent response and became seizure free for months together. Clobazam has also been found effective in patients with another form of reflex seizures known as hot water epilepsy.27 However, none of our patients was on monotherapy with clobazam. Clobazam has GABA-A agonist action similar to many other antiepileptic drugs. The precise mechanism of clobazam for its role in EE is not known. Though good response to clobazam addition was seen, we cannot suggest its efficacy as monotherapy. A bigger study with larger sample size and long term follow up may help to evaluate its efficacy.